Practice management software, med spa
The injection rooms Mindbody lost chose Aesthetic Record. That owner also picks the toxin line and signs the device lease.
Aesthetic Record is the EMR purpose-built for aesthetics, not retrofitted from a salon scheduler. Orbital has mapped every owner-operated clinic and med spa running it, which makes this dataset the cleanest account-level map of the injectable-buying owner class available to vendors. Owner on every row. No procurement desk between your AE and the signature.
providers charting in Aesthetic Record
Injectors, NPs, PAs, and CRNAs using the platform across the mapped install base. Provider count tracks injectable and laser spend more precisely than location count alone.
active Mindbody migration window in aesthetics
A meaningful share of the Aesthetic Record install base migrated from Mindbody and horizontal salon platforms over the past three years. The competitive map is still in motion.
platforms vendors compare in the aesthetics space
Aesthetic Record sits in a five-platform comparison set alongside Mangomint, Boulevard, Zenoti, Vagaro, and Mindbody. The customer overlap between them is thinner than vendor briefs suggest.
Source: Orbital data team, June 2026 snapshot.
injectors per typical owner-operated practice
ilocations per typical Aesthetic Record buyer
iB2B buyer categories for this dataset
iThe top five
Where the comparison set fans out from Aesthetic Record.
Vendors selling into aesthetics rarely build one list. They build five overlapping ones, because the platforms below split the same buyer pool along very different lines. Aesthetic Record owns the solo-injector long tail. The others fan out from there. Reconciliation note. This table ranks alternatives by how often vendors selling into med spa mention them next to Aesthetic Record in account-list briefs, not by raw customer count. Customer counts differ by an order of magnitude across the set.
| # | Alternative | Where it overlaps with Aesthetic Record |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mangomint | The modern challenger in the med-spa segment, positioned at small-group practices that have outgrown a single-injector workflow. |
| 2 | Boulevard | Skews to higher-AOV multi-location med spas and beauty brands. The aesthetic ICP that vendors fight Aesthetic Record for at the upper end. |
| 3 | Zenoti | Enterprise spa and salon platform with a growing med-spa book at the chain tier. Different buyer, similar end-user vertical. |
| 4 | Vagaro | Broad horizontal that picks up med spas as a sub-segment. Lower commitment, larger universe, weaker aesthetic-specific workflow. |
| 5 | Mindbody | The incumbent the rest of the field is taking share from. Many Aesthetic Record customers migrated off Mindbody in the last 36 months. |
As of June 2026, ranked by mention frequency in vendor account briefs. Source: Orbital data team, June 2026 snapshot.
Who buys this data
Who sells into the Aesthetic Record installed base.
This page is for the vendor selling into Aesthetic Record’s customers, not the operator using Aesthetic Record to run the room. If you ship one of the categories below, the owner-operator account list is what your AE team has been asking for.
The long version
Detail, on demand.
Aesthetic Record concentrates in one vertical and one persona: owner-operated med spas and aesthetic clinics, usually built around one to four injectors. That is the buyer behind the accounts Orbital has mapped. Operators ranging from a single nurse practitioner running her own room to small-group practices with three locations and a marketing hire.
Named operators that show up across community case studies, podcasts, and conference panels include Renee Moran Medical Aesthetics, Skin Spa New York, Ash Aesthetics, Erika Barry Aesthetics, Hania Khorshidi NP-C practice, Adrian Nowitzke CRNA practice, and Jessica Sarkis PA-C practice. The pattern is consistent: a single named provider on the sign, a tight team behind the room, and a back office that runs on one EMR rather than three.
For vendors, the takeaway is direct. The Aesthetic Record list is a clean owner-operator cut of the US aesthetics market. The owner signs the supply contract, picks the laser device, hires the PRP rep, and decides which patient-financing platform to enable. There is no procurement layer to route around. A case-study logo on a vendor site tells you who cleared PR. The list tells you who is actually buying.
If you bought “Aesthetic Record customers” from a generalist B2B database last quarter, you bought two Dallas corporate rows and missed the rest of the install base. Google the same term and you get three categories of result: case-study pages on the vendor’s own site, generalist databases that list a handful of corporate rows and call it a customer set, and broker files priced per record that went stale six months before you bought them.
The generalist databases collapse the buyer. They report “Aesthetic Record” once at the Dallas HQ and miss every clinic Orbital maps running the product. The case-study pages tell you the success stories the vendor wants out front, not the long tail of solo injectors who are 80 percent of the install base and 100 percent of the buyers for most vendor categories. The broker files look like a list right up until your AE team works them for a week.
This is the gap Orbital sits in. We map the universe of US small and mid-market businesses, detect Aesthetic Record per account on demand, find the owner or decision-maker for that account, and ship a verified contact before the conversation starts. The dataset is filterable by state, location count, provider count, and aesthetics specialty. The owner is on every row.
How the Aesthetic Record customer list is built
- Start with the US aesthetics universe. Active US med spas and aesthetic clinics, scoped to the practice that actually buys.
- Detect Aesthetic Record per account. The tech stack agent re-checks each site on demand, so the list is current the day you pull it.
- Find the owner. A named decision-maker on every row, confirmed on LinkedIn, with a verified work email and a direct dial.
- Score the ICP. Each Aesthetic Record account graded A through D against your fit formula, not against a generic SMB filter.
- Drop the dead accounts. Practices that closed, sold to a roll-up, or migrated off the platform get pruned every refresh.
- Refresh on a rolling schedule. June 2026 is the snapshot quoted on this page. Counts move when clinics open, close, or change software.
Our take
The owner-operator is the whole point.
Most aesthetics vendor lists are built by filtering a healthcare database on CPT codes and hoping the contact is reachable. The Aesthetic Record base is different: these are named owners of self-directed practices, not billing contacts at a hospital group. The procurement cycle is one conversation, not a committee. That is why device reps, injectable distributors, and PE roll-ups treat this account list as a primary prospecting asset rather than a supplementary enrichment file.
The categories below are not a market overview. They are the actual buyer types Orbital sees working the aesthetics install base every quarter, with named companies, because the generic version of this section is useless.
Injectables. Allergan, Galderma, Merz, Revance, Evolus, and the regional reps with a quota to land the next 500 injector accounts this quarter. The owner picks the toxin line, not a procurement desk.
Devices. Cynosure, Cutera, BTL, InMode, Sciton, Lutronic, and the leasing partners selling the next $80,000 capital line into an owner-operated room. One signature, one room, one device decision.
Supply. Aesthetic Insider Network, Henry Schein Aesthetic, McKesson Medical-Surgical’s aesthetic line, and the regional distributors selling the next case of needles, lidocaine, and PPE. Recurring route business, not a one-time PO.
Capital. Cherry, PatientFi, CareCredit, Alphaeon, and the consumer-finance entrants pitching the injector who is tired of declined cards at checkout. The owner enables financing at the front desk.
M&A. Skin Spa Network-style platforms, holdco buyers, and the search funds that have spent two years building a Rolodex against the owner-operator base. The owner contact is the asset, not the brand name on the door.
Demand. Influx Marketing, Cosmetic Image Marketing, RepuGen, and the agency layer selling websites, paid social, and reputation management to clinics that built their book on referrals. The owner signs the retainer.
The toolkit on top of the list: the tech stack agent confirms Aesthetic Record at each account on demand. The owner finder names the decision-maker and confirms them on LinkedIn. The email waterfall returns a deliverable work email and the phone intel agent adds a dial-or-skip read. The ICP score grades each account A through D against your fit formula. The result is a worklist of Aesthetic Record customers with a named owner and a working number on every row.
Related universes built the same way: the med-spa owner email list, the broader by-industry email lists hub, and the US med-spa universe map for the full market view.
Do not buy this if any of the following are true.
You only sell at the multi-location chain tier. Aesthetic Record concentrates in owner-operator practices. If your motion is one annual contract with a 40-location aesthetics chain, you do not need a long-tail owner-operator list. The Zenoti customer cut is the right one. The Boulevard list covers the higher-AOV multi-location end.
You sell to consumers directly. Aesthetic, beauty, and wellness DTC brands want patient and household data, not B2B owner contacts. Different motion, different data, different unit economics.
Your motion only fires above $50,000 ACV. A solo-injector room writing a six-figure annual check on day one is rare. Call us when an enterprise-only motion stalls and you need a mid-market overlay.
You sell into salon and wellness as well as med spa. The Aesthetic Record base is aesthetics-only and skips the broader salon and fitness segment. The Vagaro customer list is the wider horizontal cut for that motion.
You need real-time license status. State boards of nursing and medicine publish those, with disciplinary actions and reinstatement windows that move daily. We refresh monthly, which is the right cadence for prospecting and the wrong cadence for compliance gatekeeping.
Questions
Before you ask sales about the Aesthetic Record dataset.
Can I get a verified list of Aesthetic Record customers?
Yes. Orbital ships a per-account dataset of every med spa and aesthetic clinic it has mapped running Aesthetic Record, each row enriched with a named owner, a deliverable work email, a direct dial, and an ICP score against your fit formula. You filter by state, location count, and specialty before you export.
How current is the Aesthetic Record customer data?
Every record is produced live when you pull the list. The tech stack agent re-checks the site on demand, so you are working a current set of Aesthetic Record users rather than a roster file that went stale on delivery. June 2026 is the snapshot quoted on this page.
What are the best Aesthetic Record alternatives?
The five most common Aesthetic Record alternatives that vendors run into are Mangomint, Boulevard, Zenoti, Vagaro, and Mindbody. Each one carries a different customer profile, from solo injectors at the small end to multi-location chains at the upper end. The customer list, not the feature list, is usually the decision input for vendors.
When is the Aesthetic Record dataset the wrong fit?
Three cases. First, if you only sell at the multi-location chain tier, Aesthetic Record customers skew owner-operator and will not fit. The Zenoti customer cut or the Boulevard list is the better match. Second, if you sell to consumers directly, you want patient data, not B2B owner contacts. Third, if your motion only fires above $50,000 in annual contract value, the long tail of solo injectors will not clear your unit economics.
See the Aesthetic Record customer dataset before you pay for it.
Tell us the states, location counts, and specialties you want. We send a free sample of around 100 verified owner records you can check against your own pipeline. No commitment, no email-list back-and-forth.
Get the sample